For most Google Home households, I’d start with the Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt: its built-in Wi-Fi supports remote control without a separate hub, while its keypad gives guests a straightforward way in. The Yale Smart Lock Deadbolt with Google Matter stands out if you want a Matter-based setup, and the ULTRALOQ Bolt Fingerprint WiFi is a better fit if fingerprint entry and a door sensor matter more than a simple keypad. The main tradeoffs are connection method, installation fit, and whether you want a deadbolt alone or a complete lock-and-handle set. I compare all 15 options by their Google Home fit, entry methods, setup demands, and practical drawbacks below. Read on for the full breakdown and guidance on choosing a lock that suits your door and routines.
Get home appliances delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Complete the kit
Key Takeaways
- Built-in Wi-Fi is the simplest route to remote access: the Schlage Encode models and several Philips options avoid the added setup of a separate bridge, while still requiring a reliable signal near the door.
- Matter changes the setup tradeoff, not the door-fit requirements: the Yale Matter deadbolt and ULTRALOQ Bolt SE are appealing for a standards-based smart-home setup, but buyers still need to check controller, network, and feature compatibility.
- Fingerprint entry is a convenience choice with more upkeep: Lockly, ULTRALOQ, eufy, and Philips fingerprint models add quick entry, but their extra biometric features may not matter to households that mainly use codes.
- Lock format separates several Philips picks: some products are deadbolts, while others include lever handles or a full handle set; replacing a whole entry set can simplify matching hardware but adds more fit checks.
- Google Home compatibility does not mean identical controls: app features and voice commands can vary by model and connection method, so buyers should confirm the exact Google Home functions they need before choosing.
| Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Lever Lock, Century Trim, Matte Black |  | Best for High-Traffic Access | Connectivity: Built-in Wi-Fi | Access methods: Touchscreen keypad and app | Access code capacity: Up to 100 codes | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips 4200 Series Wi-Fi Keypad Deadbolt with Handle |  | Best for Fingerprint Entry | Connectivity: 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | Access methods: App, fingerprint, PIN, Alexa, and Google Assistant | PIN types: Permanent, one-time, periodic, and recurring | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips DDL240X-1HW-L WiFi Smart Door Lock Set with Touchscreen and Lever Handles |  | Best for a Complete Hardware Refresh | Connectivity: Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, PIN, key, app, and voice | Fingerprint capacity: Up to 50 fingerprints | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Lockly Secure Pro Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt with Fingerprint Reader |  | Best for Keypad Privacy | Lock type: Deadbolt | Connectivity: Built-in Wi-Fi | Access methods: Fingerprint, PIN Genie keypad, app, voice, and physical key | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Front Door Lock Set with Handle |  | Best for Scheduled Guest Codes | Connectivity: Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | Unlock methods: Mobile app, voice, keypad password, and physical key | Password capacity: Up to 100 custom passwords | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock with Fingerprint and Passcode Entry |  | Best for Flexible Entry | Model: DDL242X-1HW | Unlock methods: App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, Alexa, Google Assistant | Wi-Fi: Built-in 2.4 GHz; no extra hub required | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Google Nest x Yale Smart Lock with Keypad and Nest Connect, Satin Nickel |  | Best for Nest Households | Model: RB-YRD540-WV-619 | Finish: Satin Nickel | Lock type: Smart deadbolt | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt Lock with Century Trim, Matte Black |  | Best Overall for Google Home | Model: BE489WBCEN622 | Trim and finish: Century; Matte Black | Connectivity: Built-in Wi-Fi | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ULTRALOQ Bolt Fingerprint WiFi Smart Lock with Door Sensor |  | Best for Door-Status Monitoring | Model: BOLT-F-NK | Connectivity: 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no bridge required | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, passcode, app, auto unlock, voice, web portal, physical keys | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| eufy Security Smart Lock E32 with Fingerprint Keyless Entry |  | Best for Multi-Platform Homes | Model: E32 (T85F2) | Lock type: Deadbolt | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, app, remote, touch, voice | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ULTRALOQ Bolt SE Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock with Matter Support |  | Best for Flexible Entry Options | Connectivity: 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, Matter over Thread | Entry methods: Fingerprint, passcode, app, web portal, eKey, voice control, mechanical key | Fingerprint capacity: Up to 50 | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Schlage Arrive Smart WiFi Deadbolt with Camelot Trim, Satin Nickel |  | Best for Large Households | Connectivity: Built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth | Smart-home compatibility: Google Home, Alexa | Access codes: Up to 250 | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Keypad Deadbolt Lock Set with Handles |  | Best for a Coordinated Lock-and-Handle Set | Model: DDL240X-1HW-H2 | Unlock methods: App, fingerprint, PIN code, key, Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | User PIN codes: Up to 100 | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| LNDU HK01W WiFi Smart Lock with Apple HomeKey and Fingerprint Deadbolt |  | Best for Apple-and-Google Homes | Model: HK01W | Connectivity: Wi-Fi | Smart-home integration: Apple HomeKit, Amazon Alexa, Google Home | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Yale Smart Lock Deadbolt with Google Matter, Keyless Entry, Matte Black |  | Best for Google Home and Matter | Connectivity: Matter over Thread; 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi noted in product information | Google Home access: Google Home control; remote access requires a Matter-enabled hub | Entry methods: Phone tap, keypad code, Google Assistant voice command, backup key | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| smart locks for Google Home | Connectivity |
|---|---|
| Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Leve | Built-in Wi-Fi |
| Philips 4200 Series Wi-Fi Keyp | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required |
| Philips DDL240X-1HW-L WiFi Sma | Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi |
| Lockly Secure Pro Wi-Fi Smart | Built-in Wi-Fi |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Front Door | Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt L | — |
| Google Nest x Yale Smart Lock | — |
| Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Dead | Built-in Wi-Fi |
| ULTRALOQ Bolt Fingerprint WiFi | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no bridge required |
| eufy Security Smart Lock E32 w | — |
| ULTRALOQ Bolt SE Wi-Fi Smart D | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, Matter over Thread |
| Schlage Arrive Smart WiFi Dead | Built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Keypad Dea | — |
| LNDU HK01W WiFi Smart Lock wit | Wi-Fi |
| Yale Smart Lock Deadbolt with | Matter over Thread; 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi noted in product information |
More Details on Our Top Picks
Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Lever Lock, Century Trim, Matte Black
The Schlage Encode lever is the strongest fit here for households that want Google Assistant access management alongside frequent keypad use. Its built-in Wi-Fi lets me manage the lock remotely without a separate hub, while support for up to 100 codes, activity history, and notifications helps me keep track of who has access. Compared with the Philips 4200 Series, it adds a customizable alarm and a fingerprint-resistant touchscreen, giving security-conscious buyers more than fingerprint entry alone. The tradeoff is that this is a lever lock, not a standard deadbolt replacement, so door hardware and use case matter. Remote features also depend on home Wi-Fi, and the electronics warranty is three years rather than the longer mechanical and finish coverage.
Pros:- Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote app access without an extra hub
- Stores up to 100 access codes and provides lock history and notifications
- Customizable alarm and fingerprint-resistant touchscreen
- Scheduled auto-locking and interior control buttons
Cons:- Requires working home Wi-Fi for remote app control
- Lever format may not suit doors designed for a standard deadbolt
- Electronics warranty is limited to three years
Best for: Households with frequent visitors, cleaners, or family members who need many keypad codes and remote activity alerts through Google Home.
Not ideal for: Buyers replacing a conventional deadbolt or anyone whose door requires deadbolt hardware rather than a lever lock.
- Connectivity:Built-in Wi-Fi
- Access methods:Touchscreen keypad and app
- Access code capacity:Up to 100 codes
- Voice assistants:Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant
- Alarm:Customizable built-in alarm
- Finish:Matte Black
- Warranty:Limited lifetime mechanical and finish; limited three-year electronics
Our verdict“Choose this Schlage if you want a Wi-Fi-connected lever with plentiful access codes and monitoring, but skip it if you need a deadbolt replacement.”
Philips 4200 Series Wi-Fi Keypad Deadbolt with Handle
The Philips 4200 Series suits buyers who want a quick fingerprint option without giving up Google Assistant voice control or PIN access. It connects directly to 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, so there is no separate hub, and its fingerprint reader is specified to unlock in 0.3 seconds. The range of permanent, one-time, periodic, and recurring PINs gives me more ways to grant access than a basic keypad lock. Compared with the Schlage Encode lever, this is a deadbolt-and-handle set with fingerprint entry, but the Schlage offers a built-in alarm and supports more codes. Setup details also matter: batteries are not included, auto-lock is off by default, and left-opening doors need a reset. Its stated Wi-Fi guidance is to keep it within 33 feet of the router.
Pros:- Direct 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi connection requires no hub
- Combines fingerprint, app, PIN, and voice-assistant access
- Supports permanent, one-time, periodic, and recurring PINs
- Includes a matching handle set and adjustable auto-lock timing
Cons:- Batteries are not included
- Auto-lock must be enabled because it is off by default
- Left-opening doors require a reset, and Wi-Fi works best near the router
Best for: Buyers who want fingerprint convenience, several kinds of temporary PIN access, and a matching handle set for a standard door.
Not ideal for: People with left-opening doors who want minimal setup, or homes where the lock must sit far from the Wi-Fi router.
- Connectivity:2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required
- Access methods:App, fingerprint, PIN, Alexa, and Google Assistant
- PIN types:Permanent, one-time, periodic, and recurring
- Fingerprint unlock time:0.3 seconds
- Auto-lock setting:0–180 seconds; off by default
- Battery life:Up to 6 months
- Door thickness:1⅜–1¾ inches (38–50 mm)
- Default handing:Right-opening; reset required for left-opening doors
Our verdict“Pick the Philips 4200 Series if fast fingerprint entry and varied PIN schedules matter more than Schlage’s larger code capacity and built-in alarm.”
Philips DDL240X-1HW-L WiFi Smart Door Lock Set with Touchscreen and Lever Handles
This Philips set makes the most sense when I want to replace both sides of the door hardware rather than add a smart lock to an existing handle. It includes two lever handles and offers fingerprint, PIN, key, app, and Google Assistant access over built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi. Capacity is generous: up to 50 fingerprints and 100 user PINs, plus unlimited one-time PINs. Compared with the Philips 4200 Series, this model includes eight AA batteries and gives clear capacity figures for fingerprints and PINs; the 4200 Series instead lists recurring and periodic PIN types and a specific auto-lock range. A limitation for hosting is that timed and recurring PIN sharing requires a separately sold Philips WiFi Gateway. The auto-lock feature also has no door-closed sensor, so it cannot confirm the door is shut before locking.
Pros:- Includes two lever handles for a full hardware update
- Built-in Wi-Fi supports app control without a hub
- Offers fingerprint, PIN, physical-key, app, and voice access
- Includes eight AA batteries
Cons:- Timed and recurring PIN sharing requires a separately sold Philips WiFi Gateway
- Auto-lock lacks a sensor to confirm the door is fully closed
- Supports 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi only
Best for: Homeowners replacing existing lever hardware who want fingerprint and keypad entry, included batteries, and Google Assistant compatibility.
Not ideal for: People who need timed or recurring guest codes without extra equipment, or who want a lock that detects whether the door is closed.
- Connectivity:Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, PIN, key, app, and voice
- Fingerprint capacity:Up to 50 fingerprints
- PIN capacity:100 user PINs; unlimited one-time PINs
- Voice assistants:Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant
- Door compatibility:Standard doors 1⅜–1¾ inches thick
- Included hardware:Two lever handles, mounting hardware, and eight AA batteries
Our verdict“Choose this Philips set for a complete lever-hardware refresh with broad entry methods, but not if sensor-verified locking or gateway-free scheduled codes are priorities.”
Lockly Secure Pro Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt with Fingerprint Reader
The Lockly Secure Pro is the pick for buyers who want fingerprint convenience but also care about reducing exposure of their PIN. Its PIN Genie keypad scrambles digit positions, making it harder for someone watching the entry process to infer a code. Built-in Wi-Fi supports remote control, alerts, and access history without a hub, while offline access codes provide another way to share entry when connectivity is unavailable. Compared with the Philips 4200 Series, Lockly adds that shuffled-keypad approach and supports left- or right-swing doors across a wider stated thickness range; Philips instead specifies multiple scheduled PIN types. The costs of this flexibility are fit restrictions: it is not compatible with storm doors or round latch holes, and it requires a compatible standard U.S. door. Its electronics warranty is two years.
Pros:- PIN Genie keypad scrambles digit positions
- Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote control without an extra hub
- Fingerprint, app, voice, physical-key, and keypad entry options
- Offline access codes can be shared for guests or service access
Cons:- Not compatible with storm doors or round latch holes
- Requires a compatible standard U.S. door
- Electronics warranty is limited to two years
Best for: Security-minded households that want fingerprint entry, remote Google Assistant control, and a keypad designed to obscure code entry.
Not ideal for: Owners with storm doors, round latch holes, or nonstandard door preparations who cannot meet its installation requirements.
- Lock type:Deadbolt
- Connectivity:Built-in Wi-Fi
- Access methods:Fingerprint, PIN Genie keypad, app, voice, and physical key
- Voice assistants:Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant
- Fingerprint recognition:As fast as 0.2 seconds
- Door compatibility:Left- or right-swing doors 1⅜–2 inches thick
- Dimensions:8.4 × 8.8 × 4.6 inches
- Warranty:Five years mechanical; two years electronics
Our verdict“Choose Lockly over the Philips 4200 Series if keypad privacy and offline codes matter most, provided your door meets its specific fit requirements.”
Philips Wi-Fi Smart Front Door Lock Set with Handle
For a front door shared with visitors, contractors, or short-term guests, this Philips set centers on password flexibility: it stores up to 100 passwords, including permanent, one-time, and time-based options. Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi supports app control and Google Assistant without a hub, while adjustable auto-lock timing can help reduce the chance of leaving the deadbolt unlocked. Unlike the Philips DDL240X-1HW-L, this model lists time-based passwords directly and includes a long handle, making guest scheduling a more prominent strength. The tradeoff is less detail about fingerprint access: the listed entry methods are app, voice, keypad, and physical key. Buyers also need to supply eight AA batteries and verify their door’s thickness and cross-bore dimensions before ordering.
Pros:- Supports up to 100 permanent, one-time, or time-based passwords
- Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote app control without a hub
- Works with Google Assistant and supports physical-key entry
- Includes a handle and adjustable 10–180 second auto-lock
Cons:- Eight AA alkaline batteries are required and not included
- Works with 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi networks only
- Fits only specified standard deadbolt dimensions
Best for: Households that regularly grant temporary access and want up to 100 scheduled or one-time passwords with a matching handle.
Not ideal for: Buyers who specifically want fingerprint unlocking, use a nonstandard deadbolt preparation, or prefer a lock that includes batteries.
- Connectivity:Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required
- Unlock methods:Mobile app, voice, keypad password, and physical key
- Password capacity:Up to 100 custom passwords
- Password types:Permanent, one-time, and time-based
- Auto-lock range:10–180 seconds
- Door thickness:1⅜–2 inches (35–50 mm)
- Cross-bore compatibility:1½ or 2⅛ inches (38 or 54 mm)
- Power:Eight AA (LR6) alkaline batteries, not included
Our verdict“Choose this Philips set over the DDL240X if scheduled guest passwords are the priority, but look elsewhere if fingerprint entry or batteries in the box matter.”
Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock with Fingerprint and Passcode Entry
The Philips stands out for households that want several ways to get in without adding a separate hub: it pairs Google Assistant voice control with fingerprint, passcode, app, and physical-key access. Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi also supports remote control and activity alerts, while capacity for 100 custom passcodes plus unlimited one-time or scheduled codes suits homes with regular visitors. Compared with the Schlage Encode, this Philips adds fingerprint entry, but Schlage provides a built-in alarm and its listed door fit is narrower and more clearly specified. The Philips needs a nearby 2.4 GHz signal, and its router guidance of up to 65 feet may constrain placement. AA batteries are not included, and there is no door sensor, so it cannot independently report whether the door itself is open.
Pros:- Five listed entry options include fingerprint, passcode, app, physical key, and voice control.
- Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote access without an extra hub.
- Supports up to 100 custom passcodes and unlimited one-time or scheduled codes.
- Adjustable auto-lock delay and Away Mode provide useful access controls.
Cons:- Requires 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, with a recommended router distance of no more than 65 feet.
- AA alkaline batteries are not included.
- No included door sensor for monitoring whether the door is open.
Best for: Households that want fingerprint entry, flexible guest codes, and Google Assistant control without buying a hub.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need door-open status monitoring, have weak 2.4 GHz coverage near the entrance, or want batteries included.
- Model:DDL242X-1HW
- Unlock methods:App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, Alexa, Google Assistant
- Wi-Fi:Built-in 2.4 GHz; no extra hub required
- Passcode capacity:Up to 100 custom passcodes; unlimited one-time or scheduled codes
- Auto-lock delay:10–180 seconds
- Door thickness:1⅜–2 in (38–50 mm)
- Power:AA alkaline (LR6) batteries; not included
- Door sensor:Not included
Our verdict“Choose this Philips if fingerprint access and a large range of guest-code options matter more than a door sensor or included batteries.”
Google Nest x Yale Smart Lock with Keypad and Nest Connect, Satin Nickel
This is the most Nest-centered pick here: the keypad and Nest app handle everyday entry and remote lock control, while scheduled passcodes make it easier to give guests time-limited access. Privacy Mode can disable keypad codes, and tamper and activity alerts add useful awareness. For a Google Home buyer, the appeal is strongest if the household already relies on Nest; the included Nest Connect supports remote features, though internet and Wi-Fi are also required. By contrast, the Schlage Encode connects to Wi-Fi without a separate accessory, and the Philips fingerprint deadbolt offers biometric entry. This Yale trades those options for a more focused keypad experience. Check backset, cross bore, and door thickness before buying, since the provided fit details require measurement rather than giving a specific compatibility range.
Pros:- Keypad entry and Nest app control suit a Nest-centered smart home.
- Scheduled passcodes support controlled access for guests.
- Privacy Mode can disable keypad passcode entry.
- Tamper alerts and lock activity notifications provide useful status updates.
Cons:- Remote control, alerts, and custom schedules require internet, Wi-Fi, and Nest Connect or Nest Guard.
- No fingerprint entry is listed, unlike the Philips and ULTRALOQ options.
- Door fit must be checked by measuring the backset, cross bore, and door thickness.
Best for: Google Home households already using Nest devices that want scheduled guest codes, app control, and keypad entry.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want fingerprint unlocking, a deadbolt that connects remotely without Nest Connect or Nest Guard, or a clearly stated door-fit range.
- Model:RB-YRD540-WV-619
- Finish:Satin Nickel
- Lock type:Smart deadbolt
- Entry methods:Keypad passcode and Nest app
- Remote connectivity:Internet, Wi-Fi, and Nest Connect or Nest Guard required
- Included power:4 AA batteries
- Included components:Nest x Yale Lock, Nest Connect, installation guide, mounting hardware
- Door fit:Check backset, cross bore, and door thickness before installation
Our verdict“Pick the Nest x Yale if you already use Nest and prefer scheduled keypad access over built-in Wi-Fi without an accessory or fingerprint entry.”
Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt Lock with Century Trim, Matte Black
The Schlage Encode is my strongest all-around choice for Google Home buyers who want remote access without adding a hub. Its built-in Wi-Fi connects to the home network, and the listing specifies Google Home voice control alongside app-based locking, activity history, and customizable notifications. Up to 100 access codes give it room for household members and guests; a built-in alarm adds a layer of awareness that the Philips fingerprint deadbolt does not list. The tradeoff is a keypad rather than biometric entry, so the Philips or ULTRALOQ may suit buyers who want a fingerprint option. Schlage also lists standard-door dimensions and an included physical key, plus four AA batteries. Google Home compatibility is specified, but the listed app and remote features depend on a secure Wi-Fi connection.
Pros:- Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote app access without an extra hub.
- Google Home voice control is listed, alongside Alexa compatibility.
- Supports up to 100 access codes and lock-history viewing.
- Built-in customizable alarm, auto-lock, and included physical backup key add practical security options.
Cons:- Uses a touchscreen keypad rather than fingerprint entry.
- Remote access and notifications depend on a secure Wi-Fi connection.
- Listed fit is limited to doors 1⅜–1¾ inches thick with a 2⅜- or 2¾-inch backset.
Best for: Google Home users who want hub-free remote access, substantial guest-code capacity, and a built-in alarm.
Not ideal for: Buyers who prioritize fingerprint unlocking, need a door sensor, or have a door outside the stated thickness and backset fit.
- Model:BE489WBCEN622
- Trim and finish:Century; Matte Black
- Connectivity:Built-in Wi-Fi
- Smart home control:Google Home and Alexa
- Access codes:Up to 100
- Door thickness:1⅜–1¾ in
- Backset:2⅜ or 2¾ in
- Power and backup:4 AA batteries included; 1 physical backup key included
- Security features:Customizable built-in alarm, encrypted connection, fingerprint-resistant touchscreen
Our verdict“Choose the Schlage Encode for a straightforward Google Home setup with hub-free remote control, broad code capacity, and an alarm.”
ULTRALOQ Bolt Fingerprint WiFi Smart Lock with Door Sensor
The ULTRALOQ is the most feature-packed choice here for buyers who want to know more than whether the deadbolt is locked. Its included door sensor reports door status, while built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi enables remote access without a bridge. Google Assistant joins Alexa and Siri among its voice-control options, and the seven listed entry methods include fingerprint, passcode, app, and physical keys. That broader toolkit exceeds the simpler keypad-and-app approach of the Nest x Yale, and its IP65 rating offers stronger stated weather resistance than the eufy E32’s IP53 rating. The tradeoffs are a 2.4 GHz-only network and a recommended router distance of up to 70 feet. It uses eight AA batteries, so plan for a larger battery load than the Philips model.
Pros:- Includes a door sensor for real-time door-status monitoring.
- Google Assistant control and built-in Wi-Fi support remote operation without a bridge.
- Seven unlocking methods include fingerprint, passcode, app, and physical keys.
- IP65 weather resistance and zinc-alloy construction suit exposed entrances.
Cons:- Supports 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi only, which may require network configuration.
- Router guidance recommends a distance of no more than 70 feet.
- Requires eight AA batteries.
Best for: Google Home households that want remote access, fingerprint entry, and a sensor showing whether the door is open or closed.
Not ideal for: Buyers whose 2.4 GHz router is far from the entrance or who want a lock with a smaller battery requirement.
- Model:BOLT-F-NK
- Connectivity:2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no bridge required
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, passcode, app, auto unlock, voice, web portal, physical keys
- Capacity:Up to 50 fingerprints and 50 passcodes
- Door sensor:Included
- Material and weather resistance:Zinc alloy; IP65
- Power:8 AA batteries
- Included components:2 emergency keys, 8 AA batteries, installation kit, user guide, door sensor
Our verdict“Choose the ULTRALOQ if door-open status and multiple entry methods matter more than minimizing batteries or Wi-Fi requirements.”
eufy Security Smart Lock E32 with Fingerprint Keyless Entry
The eufy E32 makes the most sense when Google Home is one part of a mixed smart-home setup. Its listed compatibility spans Google Home, Apple Home, Alexa, SmartThings, and Matter, while fingerprint, app, touch, remote, and voice options cover different household habits. Built-in Wi-Fi supports remote access and event history through the eufy app, and the stated battery life of up to eight months gives buyers a useful planning estimate. Against the Schlage Encode, the E32 adds fingerprint entry and broader platform support, while Schlage lists a built-in alarm and a physical backup key. Eufy’s IP53 rating is below the ULTRALOQ’s IP65, and its fit is limited to many standard US and Canadian single-cylinder deadbolts; round or non-standard faceplates and mortise locks are not listed as compatible.
Pros:- Listed compatibility includes Google Home, Apple Home, Alexa, SmartThings, and Matter.
- Fingerprint, app, touch, remote, and voice entry give household members multiple options.
- Built-in Wi-Fi supports remote access and event history through the eufy app.
- DIY installation requires no drilling for many compatible standard deadbolts.
Cons:- Not compatible with mortise locks or round and non-standard faceplates.
- IP53 weather resistance is lower than the ULTRALOQ’s stated IP65 rating.
- Battery life varies with use and is specified at up to eight months.
Best for: Households using Google Home alongside other platforms that want fingerprint access and app-based event history.
Not ideal for: Owners of mortise locks, round or non-standard faceplates, or anyone needing a more weather-resistant rating than IP53.
- Model:E32 (T85F2)
- Lock type:Deadbolt
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, app, remote, touch, voice
- Smart home compatibility:Apple Home, Google Home, Alexa, SmartThings, Matter
- Power:8 AA batteries
- Battery life:Up to 8 months
- Weather resistance:IP53
- Operating temperature:-22°F to 158°F (-30°C to 70°C)
- Compatibility and installation:Many standard US and Canadian single-cylinder deadbolts; DIY installation with no drilling for most compatible doors
Our verdict“Pick the eufy E32 if you need Google Home compatibility across a multi-platform household and your door matches its deadbolt fit.”
ULTRALOQ Bolt SE Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock with Matter Support
The Bolt SE is a strong fit for households that want Google Home access without giving up a keypad, fingerprint reader, or physical key. Its built-in Wi-Fi enables remote management without a hub for Wi-Fi features, while Matter over Thread adds a path into compatible smart-home setups. That combination gives it more entry variety than the Schlage Arrive, which centers on its keypad and app. The IP65 weather rating and stated battery life of up to 18 months also suit exterior doors where frequent battery changes are unwelcome. The tradeoff is that Matter remote access still needs a compatible Thread hub, and Wi-Fi works only on 2.4 GHz. I’d skip it if a door sensor is a must; one isn’t included.
Pros:- Seven listed entry methods include fingerprint, passcode, app, voice control, and mechanical key
- Built-in Wi-Fi supports remote management without a hub for Wi-Fi features
- IP65 water resistance and zinc-alloy construction suit exposed exterior doors
- Up to 18 months of stated battery life
Cons:- Matter remote access requires a compatible Matter over Thread hub
- Wi-Fi is limited to 2.4 GHz networks
- No door sensor is included
Best for: Households that want fingerprint entry, multiple access methods, and Google Home integration with the option to use Wi-Fi features without a hub
Not ideal for: Buyers who want Matter remote access without a Thread hub, need 5 GHz Wi-Fi, or expect a door sensor in the box
- Connectivity:2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, Matter over Thread
- Entry methods:Fingerprint, passcode, app, web portal, eKey, voice control, mechanical key
- Fingerprint capacity:Up to 50
- Passcode capacity:Up to 50
- Battery life:Up to 18 months
- Material:Zinc alloy
- Water resistance:IP65
- Certification:ANSI BHMA certified
- Warranty:Lifetime mechanical; 18-month electronic
Our verdict“Choose the Bolt SE if you want fingerprint convenience and several fallback entry methods, but check your hub and Wi-Fi setup before relying on Matter.”
Schlage Arrive Smart WiFi Deadbolt with Camelot Trim, Satin Nickel
For a busy household that shares access with relatives, guests, or service providers, the Arrive’s capacity for up to 250 access codes is its clearest advantage. Schlage also includes remote lock management, entry history, and notifications through its app, with Google Home compatibility for smart-home control. Compared with the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE, the Arrive gives up fingerprint entry and the Bolt’s Matter-over-Thread option, but it offers a much larger code allowance and a familiar keypad-first approach. Its backlit, all-weather buttons help with nighttime use and outdoor exposure. The main limitation is that remote features depend on the Schlage Home app and a secure Wi-Fi connection; Bluetooth control is only available nearby when Wi-Fi isn’t. I’d choose it for code sharing, not biometric entry or Matter flexibility.
Pros:- Supports up to 250 access codes
- Provides remote management, access history, and notifications through the Schlage Home app
- Backlit silicone keypad is designed for all-weather use
- Battery operation keeps codes and schedules active during Wi-Fi or power outages
Cons:- Remote features require the Schlage Home app and a secure Wi-Fi connection
- Without Wi-Fi, app control is limited to Bluetooth range
- No fingerprint entry or Matter support is listed
Best for: Families, landlords, or households that need to issue and manage many individual keypad codes through Google Home-compatible smart-home routines
Not ideal for: Buyers who want fingerprint access, Matter integration, or remote app control that remains available without Wi-Fi
- Connectivity:Built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth
- Smart-home compatibility:Google Home, Alexa
- Access codes:Up to 250
- Keypad:Backlit, all-weather silicone push buttons
- Door thickness:1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches
- Backset:2-3/8 or 2-3/4 inches
- Power:Battery-powered
- Finish and trim:Satin nickel, Camelot
- Warranty:Limited lifetime mechanical and finish; limited 3-year electronics
Our verdict“Pick the Arrive when managing a large roster of keypad users matters more than fingerprint access or Matter-based flexibility.”
Philips Wi-Fi Smart Keypad Deadbolt Lock Set with Handles
This Philips set makes the most sense when you’re replacing both a deadbolt and the matching door handles, rather than adding a deadbolt alone. It combines remote app management and door-status monitoring with fingerprint, PIN, key, and voice-assistant entry, including Google Assistant. Up to 100 user PINs and unlimited one-time PINs give it more flexibility for temporary visitors than the Yale Smart Lock’s keypad codes, while the Yale has a clearer Matter-focused Google Home setup. The Philips also lets you adjust auto-lock timing from 30 to 180 seconds, which can reduce the chance of a door staying unlocked after someone leaves. The important fit check is its 35–50 mm door-thickness requirement. Remote features rely on the Philips app and Wi-Fi, so this is less appealing if you want Matter-based control or haven’t confirmed your door measurements.
Pros:- Includes a matching handle set with the keypad deadbolt
- Offers fingerprint, PIN, key, app, and voice-assistant access
- Supports up to 100 user PINs and unlimited one-time PINs
- Adjustable auto-lock timer ranges from 30 to 180 seconds
Cons:- Compatible door thickness is limited to 35–50 mm
- Remote management depends on the Philips app and Wi-Fi
- No Matter support is listed
Best for: Homeowners replacing a deadbolt and handles together who want fingerprint entry, temporary PINs, and app-based door-status monitoring
Not ideal for: Buyers who only need a deadbolt, have a door outside the 35–50 mm thickness range, or prefer a Matter-centered Google Home connection
- Model:DDL240X-1HW-H2
- Unlock methods:App, fingerprint, PIN code, key, Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant
- User PIN codes:Up to 100
- One-time PIN codes:Unlimited
- Auto-lock timer:30–180 seconds
- Compatible door thickness:35–50 mm
- Included components:Door lock, handle set, 4 batteries
- Remote management:Philips app over Wi-Fi
Our verdict“Choose this Philips set if you’re replacing the handle as well as the deadbolt and your door fits its specified thickness range.”
LNDU HK01W WiFi Smart Lock with Apple HomeKey and Fingerprint Deadbolt
The HK01W is the most cross-ecosystem-minded pick here: it lists Google Home, Alexa, and Apple HomeKit, while adding Apple HomeKey for tap-to-unlock with an iPhone or Apple Watch. That makes it a more natural match for a household split between Apple devices and Google Home than the Google-oriented Yale Matter lock. Fingerprint, password, app, and voice access give it several alternatives, and its IP65 rating and stated operating range of -4°F to 140°F suit exposed entry doors. The tradeoff is that HomeKey is a specialized benefit for Apple users, not a reason for Google-only households to choose it. Remote features and voice control also depend on a stable Wi-Fi connection. The product data doesn’t specify code capacity or detailed door-fit measurements, so I’d verify compatibility before ordering.
Pros:- Lists compatibility with Google Home, Apple HomeKit, and Alexa
- Apple HomeKey supports tap-to-unlock with iPhone or Apple Watch
- Fingerprint, password, app, and voice control provide alternative entry methods
- BHMA certified and IP65 waterproof, with a stated operating range of -4°F to 140°F
Cons:- Remote features and voice control require a stable Wi-Fi connection
- Apple HomeKey functionality is limited to five hours after iPhone battery depletion
- Product data does not specify access-code capacity or door-thickness compatibility
Best for: Households using Google Home alongside iPhones or Apple Watches that want both Apple HomeKey and fingerprint entry
Not ideal for: Google-only buyers who don’t need Apple HomeKey, or anyone who needs published code-capacity and door-fit details before choosing a lock
- Model:HK01W
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi
- Smart-home integration:Apple HomeKit, Amazon Alexa, Google Home
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, Apple HomeKey, password, app, voice
- Certification:BHMA certified
- Water resistance:IP65
- Operating temperature:-4°F to 140°F
- Included components:Smart lock set, 2 keys, installation guide, user manual
Our verdict“Choose the HK01W if your home uses Google Home and Apple devices together; skip its Apple-focused extras if you only need straightforward Google control.”
Yale Smart Lock Deadbolt with Google Matter, Keyless Entry, Matte Black
For a Google Home household, the Yale’s main advantage is that it is built around Matter over Thread, rather than treating Google compatibility as one item on a broad list. With a compatible Matter hub, you can control the lock remotely through supported Google Home devices; without one, remote access is not available. Its keypad supports unlimited codes, and the product description also lists schedules, expiration dates, entry tracking, Google Assistant voice control, and a backup key. Compared with the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE, the Yale has a more explicit Google-and-Matter focus, while the Bolt adds fingerprint entry and built-in Wi-Fi for its Wi-Fi features. The Yale’s tradeoff is the separate hub requirement and its US-and-Canada availability. Grade 2 certification and a stated -22°F to 140°F operating range add practical reassurance for a front door.
Pros:- Matter over Thread is designed for integration with Google Home and compatible hubs
- Supports unlimited keypad codes with schedules and expiration dates
- Includes Google Assistant voice control and a backup key
- Grade 2 certified and specified to operate from -22°F to 140°F
Cons:- Remote access requires a separately supplied Matter-enabled hub
- Fingerprint entry is not listed
- Product is specified for use in the United States and Canada
Best for: Google Home users who already have, or plan to add, a compatible Matter hub and want a keypad lock with flexible code sharing
Not ideal for: Buyers who want remote access without a Matter hub, need fingerprint unlocking, or live outside the stated US-and-Canada service area
- Connectivity:Matter over Thread; 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi noted in product information
- Google Home access:Google Home control; remote access requires a Matter-enabled hub
- Entry methods:Phone tap, keypad code, Google Assistant voice command, backup key
- Code capacity:Unlimited codes
- Certification:BHMA Grade 2
- Operating temperature:-22°F to 140°F
- Compatible door thickness:1-3/4 to 2-1/4 inches
- Bore hole:2-1/8 inches
- Warranty:2 years
Our verdict“Choose the Yale for a Google Home setup centered on Matter, provided you have a compatible hub and don’t need fingerprint entry.”
How We Picked
I ranked these locks by how clearly they serve a Google Home household, not by the length of their feature lists. I weighed the stated connection method, Google Home or Matter positioning, available entry methods, and whether the product replaces a deadbolt alone or includes handles. I also considered everyday usability: keypad access for guests, fingerprint entry for quick arrivals, remote access needs, and the extra setup that can come with a bridge or smart-home controller.
The ordering favors options with a practical mix of Google Home fit, straightforward access, and fewer added dependencies. A feature-rich fingerprint lock can be the better choice for a specific household, but it does not automatically outrank a simpler deadbolt that meets common needs with less complexity. I also account for tradeoffs such as Wi-Fi reliability, compatibility checks, and handle-set installation. Since door dimensions and regional product variations can affect fit and functions, I treat manufacturer specifications and compatibility details as part of the buying decision rather than assuming every model works the same way.
Factors to Consider When Choosing Best Smart Locks For Google Home
Google Home compatibility is only one part of choosing a lock. I’d first match the lock to your door and daily access habits, then check how its connection method and feature set affect setup, control, and upkeep.
Check What Google Home Can Actually Control
A lock may work with Google Home without exposing every feature through Google’s app or voice controls. Before buying, check whether the specific model supports the actions you care about, such as checking lock status or controlling the lock remotely. Also review whether setup requires the manufacturer’s app, a bridge, a compatible hub, or a Matter-capable controller. Do not assume that voice control includes every setting or access-management task. For security, choose a unique spoken PIN or avoid voice unlocking if you do not need it. This check is especially useful when comparing Wi-Fi models with Matter options, since the connection route can shape the experience.
Choose Wi-Fi, Matter, or a Bridge Based on Your Setup
Built-in Wi-Fi can reduce the number of devices you install, but it relies on a strong signal at the door and may add battery demands. A bridge-based arrangement can keep the lock’s connection separate from your home Wi-Fi, though it adds another component and setup step. Matter can make a lock easier to place in a broader smart-home system, but support depends on the lock’s exact capabilities and the controllers you own. A common mistake is buying by protocol name alone without checking which Google Home functions are supported. If your router is far from the entry, test the signal there before choosing direct Wi-Fi. If you already own a compatible hub or Matter controller, factor that into the decision.
Match the Lock to the Door Hardware You Have
A deadbolt replacement is not the same project as replacing a deadbolt and lever set. Full handle-set products may give the entry a coordinated appearance, but they require more measurements and can be less forgiving if your existing door preparation differs. Check door thickness, backset, hole dimensions, handing, and clearance around nearby trim against the manufacturer’s specifications. Also confirm whether your door has a separate deadbolt and handle or a combined lock body. Buyers sometimes focus on the app and overlook these mechanical details until installation day. If you rent or want a less involved change, first check whether the lock design can work with your existing hardware and lease rules.
Pick Entry Methods for the People Who Will Use the Door
Keypads suit households that share access with family, cleaners, or visitors because codes can be easier to manage than physical keys. Fingerprint readers can speed up entry for regular users, but they add a biometric setup step and may not suit every household member. A physical key backup can be useful during a dead battery or connectivity issue, while a keyless model may better suit buyers who want fewer items to carry. Think about children, guests, and anyone who may struggle with small buttons or touchscreens. More entry methods can add flexibility, but they can also create extra settings and points of failure. Choose the access methods your household will use regularly, rather than paying attention to feature count alone.
Plan for Batteries, Connectivity, and Backup Access
Smart locks still need a dependable way to operate when the network or power is unavailable. Review the manufacturer’s battery guidance, low-battery alerts, and emergency power or key options for the exact model. A Wi-Fi outage should not leave you without a way to enter, so identify the lock’s local keypad, fingerprint, key, or other offline method before installation. Keep the manufacturer’s app available for setup and access management even if Google Home is your preferred interface. If your entry is exposed to weather, check the product’s stated environmental limits and installation requirements. A small amount of planning can prevent a connected feature from becoming a single point of failure.
Pay More Only for Features That Solve a Real Problem
Premium features are most useful when they change how you manage entry, not simply because they sound advanced. Fingerprint access, a door sensor, or a full handle set can be worthwhile if those features match your household’s routine. For a home that mostly needs scheduled or guest codes, a capable keypad deadbolt may be easier to live with. Compare the ongoing effort too: more connected features can mean more app settings, setup checks, and battery monitoring. Avoid paying for a protocol or biometric option that your Google Home setup cannot use as expected. The best fit is the least complicated lock that covers your access needs and installation constraints.
Frequently Asked Questions
Will every lock labeled for Google Home support voice unlocking?
No. Google Home compatibility can cover different functions, and voice unlocking may be limited or unavailable depending on the model, setup, and current platform rules. Check the exact product’s Google Home feature list rather than relying on a broad compatibility label. Some buyers only need status checks or routines, while others want direct control from a speaker or display. If voice unlocking is a requirement, confirm the setup steps and any PIN or security conditions before purchase. Keep a keypad, key, or other local entry method available as a backup.
Should I choose a built-in Wi-Fi lock or a Matter lock for Google Home?
Choose based on the equipment and functions you want to rely on. Built-in Wi-Fi can make remote access more direct, but the lock needs a dependable signal and its battery may need more frequent attention. Matter can suit a household building around compatible smart-home controllers, but the lock’s supported features can still vary. Confirm that your Google Home setup includes the required controller or hub for the lock you select. If you already have a stable connection at the entry and want fewer added devices, Wi-Fi may be simpler; if cross-platform integration matters, investigate Matter support closely.
Can I install one of these locks without replacing my existing handle?
Many deadbolt models are designed to replace the deadbolt while leaving a separate handle in place, but the exact installation depends on the door and product. The Philips handle-set options are different because they include additional hardware intended to replace or coordinate with the handle. Measure the door and compare its existing holes, backset, thickness, and handle arrangement with the manufacturer’s fit guide. Do not assume a lock will fit because the old deadbolt looks similar from the outside. If you want to keep your current handle, select a deadbolt-only model and verify that its interior and exterior components clear the existing trim.
Is a fingerprint smart lock a better choice than a keypad for a family?
It depends on who needs access and how much setup you want to manage. A fingerprint reader can make routine entry quick for enrolled household members, while a keypad is easier to share with guests through codes. A keypad may be the more flexible single method for a household with visitors or people whose fingerprints are not reliably recognized. Some models combine both, but extra features do not remove the need to review battery, backup-entry, and Google Home support. If accessibility or guest access is a priority, favor the method that works for everyone who uses the door rather than the one that seems fastest for one person.
What should I do if the lock loses Wi-Fi or Google Home connection?
Plan to use a local entry method that does not depend on the internet, such as a keypad, fingerprint reader, or physical key if the model includes one. Remote commands and status updates may stop working during an outage, even when the lock itself can still operate at the door. Check whether the lock provides local app control or needs its cloud connection for particular functions. Keep batteries in good condition and follow the manufacturer’s low-battery alerts so a network issue does not coincide with a power problem. Before buying, identify the specific backup method on the model you want and make sure everyone in the household knows how to use it.
Conclusion
For a strong all-around starting point, I’d choose the Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt for its built-in Wi-Fi and keypad-focused approach. Buyers seeking a Matter-oriented setup should compare it with the Yale Smart Lock Deadbolt with Google Matter, while the ULTRALOQ Bolt Fingerprint WiFi better suits households that value biometric entry and a door sensor. For value, I’d focus on the simpler keypad deadbolts in the lineup and avoid paying for fingerprint features unless they match your routine. For beginners, a deadbolt with familiar keypad access and fewer added components is the least complicated starting point; check door fit and Google Home functions before ordering. Choose a Philips handle-set model if replacing coordinated entry hardware is the goal, or a fingerprint lock if quick individual access matters most. The right pick is the one that fits your door, works with the Google Home features you actually use, and leaves you a reliable way in when connectivity is down.
