TL;DR
Get home appliances delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Ideal Home’s reviewer says the Joseph Joseph Eclipse clothes airer stands out for concealing laundry behind a neutral fabric screen while providing 14 metres of drying space. The review lists it at £135 and notes that it has no heating element; its screen may also need ironing or steaming to remove creases.
Ideal Home has highlighted the Joseph Joseph Eclipse clothes airer for its room-divider-style fabric screen, which hides laundry while it dries. The product is not new, but the review says its combination of concealed drying space and practical features remains distinctive; at the price cited, £135, it is also a considered purchase rather than a budget option.
The Eclipse has three tiers behind a neutral fabric screen and provides 14 metres of hanging space, according to the report. Individual shelves can fold down to make room for longer items, and wheels allow the rack to be moved around the home. The reviewer also says assembly was straightforward.
The fabric screen is the central design feature: unlike an open clothes horse, it obscures the washing from view and can make the rack resemble a room divider. The reviewer’s main qualification is that the screen arrived creased and would benefit from ironing or steaming before it looks its best. The reviewer says they had not ironed it but planned to steam it after assembly.
The report lists the airer at £135 and says it has no heating element. That means buyers should not expect it to speed up drying through heat. The reviewer’s assessment is that the Eclipse improves the appearance of indoor laundry drying, rather than making the laundry process faster.
For households that dry laundry indoors, an airer can occupy visible space for hours or even much of the day. The Eclipse addresses that everyday problem by hiding clothes behind a screen, rather than changing how quickly they dry. That distinction matters: its appeal is primarily visual and practical, not a promise of faster laundry.
The £135 listed price puts the design choice in focus. Shoppers who want more drying capacity or quicker drying may prefer to compare other racks, including heated models; those who value keeping laundry out of sight may find the Eclipse’s format worth considering. The source does not provide comparative prices, drying-time tests or independent performance data, so it does not establish that the product is better value than alternatives.
Products Worth Considering
Bose QuietComfort True Wireless Earbuds with Active Noise Cancellation, Black
Amazon Kindle Paperwhite Signature Edition (12th Generation, 2024), 32 GB, Metallic Black
Samsung 27 Odyssey OLED G5 (G50SF) QHD QD-OLED Gaming Monitor
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How the Eclipse Hides Laundry
The Ideal Home report frames the Eclipse as an alternative to conventional folding clothes horses and heated airers, which typically leave washing visible. Its covered layout gives the product a different role in a living space: it can stand between the laundry and the room’s occupants while still allowing garments to hang on three tiers.
The review is based on the writer’s experience testing and using clothes airers, but the supplied material does not give a publication date, a detailed testing method or a direct side-by-side comparison with named products. It describes the Eclipse as an established design, not a newly launched product. The article also lists other good-looking airers as alternatives, but does not provide comparative test results for them.
“The Joseph Joseph Eclipse clothes airer might not be new, but I haven’t come across another that makes drying laundry look quite so stylish.”
— Ideal Home reviewer
Price and Performance Comparisons
The supplied report does not specify when it was published, whether £135 is a current price, or which retailer or market that price refers to. It also gives no measurements of drying times, stability, long-term durability or how well the screen holds up with regular use. The review’s statements about style and ease of assembly reflect the writer’s experience, rather than results from a stated comparative test.
It is also unclear how much the screen affects airflow around clothes or whether different garment loads fit comfortably across the three tiers. The source says the shelves fold down for longer items but does not quantify the space available for particular garments. These details may matter to shoppers weighing a covered rack against an open or heated model.
Check Current Price and Suitability
The report does not announce a product launch, new version or forthcoming milestone. Readers considering the Eclipse can check its current price and availability with retailers, then compare its 14 metres of drying space and fold-down shelves with the dimensions and features of other airers. They should also account for the need to steam or iron the screen if a crease-free finish is a priority.
For buyers whose main concern is drying speed, the next step is to compare models with heating features and check their specifications separately. The available report does not establish whether the Eclipse is the best option for any particular household; its clearest stated advantage is keeping hanging laundry out of view.
Key Questions
What makes the Joseph Joseph Eclipse different from a standard clothes airer?
It has a neutral fabric screen that conceals laundry, giving it a room-divider-style appearance instead of leaving clothes fully on display.
How much drying space does it provide?
The report says it has 14 metres of hanging space across three tiers. Its shelves can fold down individually to accommodate longer items.
Does the Eclipse dry clothes faster?
The report says it has no heating element, and the reviewer does not claim that it speeds up drying. Its stated benefit is concealing laundry, not reducing drying time.
What drawbacks did the reviewer mention?
The reviewer said the fabric screen needed ironing or steaming to remove creases. The cited £135 price was also described as expensive for a non-heated airer.
Source: rss
