12 Best Matter Smart Plugs for Energy Monitoring in 2027

The best Matter energy monitoring smart plugs pair broad smart-home compatibility with useful power-use data, but the options differ in connection type, outlet design, and whether energy monitoring is included. My best overall pick is the Tapo P110M, which combines Matter, energy monitoring, and a practical four-pack format. The Tapo P316M stands out if you need several controlled outlets in one place, while Eve Energy suits buyers who prefer a Thread-based plug and power meter. Your main tradeoffs are Wi-Fi versus Thread, single plugs versus multi-outlet hardware, and the value of monitoring features you may not use. Read on for the full breakdown and help matching a plug to your setup.

Before you orderOffer from Amazon

Get home appliances delivered free with Prime

• Fast, free delivery on millions of items
• Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
• Member-only deals all year

Start your free Prime trial →Free trial for eligible customers · Cancel anytime

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.Hide

Complete the kit

Bluevua Official RO100ROPOT 4-Pack Replacement Filter Set

Add to your setup →

Amazon Basics Enhanced Water Filter, Brita Filter Replace…

Add to your setup →

Bluevua Official RO100ROPOT 1-Year Replacement Filter Set

Add to your setup →

Key Takeaways

• Tapo P110M is the strongest all-around fit in this lineup for buyers who want Matter, energy monitoring, and several standard smart plugs in one package.
• The Tapo P316M serves a different job from a plug pack: its power-strip layout can consolidate multiple devices, but it is less flexible to move between rooms.
• Thread is a meaningful point of difference. The Onvis Thread models and Eve Energy options are alternatives to the Wi-Fi-heavy selection, but Thread requires a compatible border router in the home.
• Pack size does not tell the whole value story. Compare whether energy monitoring is included, which connection type is used, and whether each plug fits the outlets and devices you plan to control.
• The Tapo P210M is the only in-wall outlet here. It may suit a permanent installation better than an add-on plug, but it calls for a different fit and installation decision than portable models.

Our Top Best Matter Energy Monitoring Smart Plugs Picks

Tapo P316M Matter Smart Wi-Fi Power Strip with Energy Monitoring		Best for Monitoring Several Devices at One Outlet	Model: P316M	Connectivity: 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi	Smart home compatibility: Matter, Alexa, Google Home, Apple HomeKit, Samsung SmartThings, Bixby	VIEW LATEST PRICE	See Our Full Breakdown
Onvis Matter over Thread Smart Plug with Energy Monitoring, 4-Pack		Best Thread Pick	Model: T20-S4AM	Pack size: 4	Connectivity: Matter over Thread	VIEW LATEST PRICE	See Our Full Breakdown
SIXWGH Matter Smart Plug with Energy Monitoring, 15A/1800W, 4-Pack		Best Value for Multi-Room Coverage	Pack size: 4	Connectivity: Matter, 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, Bluetooth-assisted pairing	Compatible platforms: Alexa, Apple Home, Google Home, SmartThings, Siri	VIEW LATEST PRICE	See Our Full Breakdown
SONOFF S61s Matter Smart Plug, 15A Wi-Fi Outlet with Energy Monitoring, 4-Pack		Best for Energy-Cost Tracking	Model: S61STPB	Pack count: 4	Connectivity: Matter over 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi	VIEW LATEST PRICE	See Our Full Breakdown
SIXWGH Matter Smart Plug with Energy Monitoring, 15A/1800W, 2.4GHz Wi-Fi, Timer and Voice Control		Best Single-Plug Starter	Number of items: 1	Connectivity: Matter, 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, Bluetooth-assisted setup	Compatible ecosystems: Alexa, Apple Home, Google Home, SmartThings, Siri	VIEW LATEST PRICE	See Our Full Breakdown
Tapo P210M Matter-Certified Smart In-Wall Outlet		Best In-Wall Pick	Model: P210M	Outlet control: Two devices, independently or together	Connectivity: Wi-Fi; Bluetooth for setup	VIEW LATEST PRICE	See Our Full Breakdown
Tapo P110M Matter Smart Plugs with Energy Monitoring, 4-Pack, 15A		Best Value for Multi-Room Monitoring	Model: P110M	Pack size: 4	Maximum wattage: 1800 W	VIEW LATEST PRICE	See Our Full Breakdown
Eve Energy Matter Smart Plug with App and Voice Control		Best for Privacy-Minded Thread Users	Model: 20EBU4101	Connectivity: Matter over Thread	Voltage: 120 V AC	VIEW LATEST PRICE	See Our Full Breakdown
Kasa Matter Smart Plug with Energy Monitoring, 15A/1800W, 4-Pack		Best for Offline Wi-Fi Control	Model: KP125MP4	Pack size: 4	Maximum wattage: 1800 W	VIEW LATEST PRICE	See Our Full Breakdown
ONVIS Matter over Thread Smart Plug, 4-Pack		Best Compact Thread Four-Pack	Part number: S4-US	Pack size: 4	Connectivity: Matter, Thread	VIEW LATEST PRICE	See Our Full Breakdown
Eve Energy Matter Smart Plug and Power Meter, 2-Pack		Best for Privacy-Focused Thread Homes	Pack size: 2 plugs	Connectivity: Matter and Thread	Voltage: 120 V AC	VIEW LATEST PRICE	See Our Full Breakdown
Meross Matter Smart Plug with Energy Monitoring, 4-Pack		Best for Multi-Room Coverage	Model: MSS315	Quantity: 4 plugs	Connectivity: 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Matter	VIEW LATEST PRICE	See Our Full Breakdown

More Details on Our Top Picks

1. Tapo P316M Matter Smart Wi-Fi Power Strip with Energy Monitoring

   

   Best for Monitoring Several Devices at One Outlet

   View Latest Price

   The Tapo P316M is the most useful choice here when energy monitoring needs to cover a cluster of devices, not just one appliance. Its six individually controlled AC outlets let you manage and monitor connected equipment separately, while the three USB ports add charging capacity without taking up outlet space. Unlike the single-outlet SONOFF S61s or the SIXWGH four-packs, this is a power strip, so it can simplify a desk or entertainment setup. Matter support, local control, and scheduling add flexible control across major platforms. The tradeoff is that the USB ports are always on and cannot be controlled individually, and the strip needs 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi. Choose it for several nearby loads; skip it if you need compact plugs distributed around a room.

   Pros:

   • Six AC outlets are controlled individually, making it easier to manage separate devices.
   • Energy monitoring and schedules help track use and automate connected equipment.
   • Matter compatibility supports integration with major smart home platforms.
   • Local network control can remain available during internet outages.

   Cons:

   • The three USB ports are always on and cannot be controlled separately.
   • Requires a 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi network.
   • Its 16.2-inch strip is less convenient than individual plugs for dispersed outlets.

   Best for: Home-office and entertainment-center owners who want to monitor and control several plugged-in devices from one strip.

   Not ideal for: Buyers who need individual smart plugs placed in different rooms, or who want smart control of USB charging ports.

   • Model:P316M
   • Connectivity:2.4 GHz Wi-Fi
   • Smart home compatibility:Matter, Alexa, Google Home, Apple HomeKit, Samsung SmartThings, Bixby
   • AC outlets:6, individually controlled
   • USB ports:3 always-on ports, 5V 2.4A
   • Maximum current:15A
   • Cord length:37 inches
   • Dimensions:16.2 x 4.8 x 1.9 inches
   Our verdict

   “Pick the Tapo P316M if several energy-monitored devices share one workspace; choose individual plugs instead for room-by-room coverage.”

   → See it on Amazon →

2. Onvis Matter over Thread Smart Plug with Energy Monitoring, 4-Pack

   

   Best Thread Pick

   View Latest Price

   The ONVIS T20-S4AM stands apart from the Wi-Fi options in this group by using Matter over Thread. For a household with a compatible Thread border router, that means local smart-home control without depending on the plug joining a Wi-Fi network. Its four-plug pack suits buyers extending energy tracking across several appliances, and the product supports real-time and historical usage alongside schedules, timers, and automations. Compared with the SIXWGH four-pack, its main distinction is Thread connectivity rather than Wi-Fi and Bluetooth-assisted setup. That advantage comes with a firm prerequisite: a compatible border router is required. Its 15A/1800W ceiling also deserves a check against the connected appliance. Skip it if you want the simplest hub-free setup.

   Pros:

   • Matter over Thread offers local control through a compatible ecosystem.
   • Tracks real-time and historical energy use.
   • Four plugs support monitoring multiple appliances.
   • Schedules, timers, and automations provide flexible control.

   Cons:

   • Requires a compatible Thread border router.
   • Maximum supported load is 15A/1800W.
   • The Thread requirement makes setup less direct than the Wi-Fi SIXWGH and SONOFF options.

   Best for: Matter users who already have a Thread border router and want local control plus energy tracking across several outlets.

   Not ideal for: Buyers without a Thread border router, or anyone wanting a Wi-Fi plug that can connect directly without extra compatible hardware.

   • Model:T20-S4AM
   • Pack size:4
   • Connectivity:Matter over Thread
   • Maximum capacity:15A / 1800W
   • Voltage:110 V
   • Plug type:Type B
   • Energy monitoring:Real-time and historical usage
   • Certification:FCC
   Our verdict

   “Choose ONVIS if you have Thread infrastructure and value local control; otherwise, a Wi-Fi Matter pack is the easier fit.”

   → See it on Amazon →

3. SIXWGH Matter Smart Plug with Energy Monitoring, 15A/1800W, 4-Pack

   

   Best Value for Multi-Room Coverage

   View Latest Price

   For buyers who want several monitored outlets without moving to Thread, the SIXWGH four-pack is a straightforward multi-room option. It uses 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, with Bluetooth-assisted pairing to help with setup, and does not require a hub. Matter compatibility spans Alexa, Apple Home, Google Home, SmartThings, and Siri; the Smart Life app adds energy monitoring, schedules, countdowns, and cycle timers. Compared with the ONVIS four-pack, SIXWGH is easier to fit into a Wi-Fi-based setup, while ONVIS is the better match for buyers already invested in Thread. The tradeoff is that 5 GHz Wi-Fi is unsupported, and the listed energy features depend on the Smart Life app. Its 15A/1800W rating and overload protection suit many household loads, but check appliance requirements before connecting high-draw equipment.

   Pros:

   • Four plugs provide coverage for multiple rooms or appliances.
   • Matter works with several major smart home platforms without a hub.
   • Energy tracking, schedules, and multiple timer modes support everyday automation.
   • Overload protection and a 15A/1800W rating suit many household devices.

   Cons:

   • Supports 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi only.
   • The listed energy monitoring is provided through the Smart Life app.
   • Wi-Fi connectivity lacks the Thread-based local network approach offered by ONVIS.

   Best for: Households that want four Matter-compatible, energy-monitoring plugs for common appliances and already use 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi.

   Not ideal for: Buyers building a Thread network, relying on 5 GHz-only Wi-Fi, or seeking monitoring without the Smart Life app.

   • Pack size:4
   • Connectivity:Matter, 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, Bluetooth-assisted pairing
   • Compatible platforms:Alexa, Apple Home, Google Home, SmartThings, Siri
   • Maximum current:15A
   • Maximum power:1800W
   • Operating voltage:125V
   • Dimensions:2 x 2 x 2 inches
   • Protection:Overload protection
   Our verdict

   “Choose this SIXWGH pack for broad Wi-Fi-based coverage and app-led energy tracking, but pick ONVIS if Thread is a priority.”

   → See it on Amazon →

4. SONOFF S61s Matter Smart Plug, 15A Wi-Fi Outlet with Energy Monitoring, 4-Pack

   

   Best for Energy-Cost Tracking

   View Latest Price

   The SONOFF S61s is a strong fit for buyers who want energy data presented with electricity-cost tracking, rather than power readings alone. Its four Wi-Fi plugs work with Matter platforms including Apple Home, Alexa, Google Home, and SmartThings, and can be controlled through eWeLink or a Matter controller. Overload protection and fire-resistant housing add practical safeguards for everyday indoor use. Compared with the SIXWGH four-pack, SONOFF’s clearest distinction is its stated ability to monitor electricity costs; SIXWGH instead highlights a wider set of timer modes and Bluetooth-assisted setup. The SONOFF requires 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and carries an IP20 rating, so it is not described as water-resistant. Its 1875W maximum also differs slightly from the 1800W rating on several alternatives, but buyers should still match the plug to their appliance.

   Pros:

   • Tracks power use and electricity costs.
   • Four plugs support monitoring and control across multiple appliances.
   • Matter compatibility covers Apple Home, Alexa, Google Home, and SmartThings.
   • Includes overload protection and fire-resistant housing.

   Cons:

   • Requires a 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi network.
   • IP20 rating means it is not described as water-resistant.
   • Does not offer Thread connectivity like the ONVIS option.

   Best for: Users who want a four-plug Matter setup with energy-use and electricity-cost tracking for indoor appliances.

   Not ideal for: Anyone needing an outdoor or water-resistant plug, or a Thread-based setup instead of Wi-Fi.

   • Model:S61STPB
   • Pack count:4
   • Connectivity:Matter over 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi
   • Maximum current:15A
   • Maximum wattage:1875W
   • Operating voltage:120V
   • Dimensions:2.36 x 1.5 x 2.13 inches
   • Warranty:2 years
   Our verdict

   “Pick the SONOFF S61s if electricity-cost tracking is your priority; look to a Thread plug if Wi-Fi is not the right network fit.”

   → See it on Amazon →

5. SIXWGH Matter Smart Plug with Energy Monitoring, 15A/1800W, 2.4GHz Wi-Fi, Timer and Voice Control

   

   Best Single-Plug Starter

   View Latest Price

   This single SIXWGH plug is the sensible entry point for someone who wants to try Matter energy monitoring on one appliance before outfitting several rooms. It offers real-time power draw and daily or monthly usage, plus app, remote, and voice control with scheduling, countdown, cycle, and random timers. Matter support covers the same major ecosystems as the SIXWGH four-pack, but this version is supplied as one plug rather than a set—useful for a targeted trial, less attractive when many outlets need monitoring. Setup uses 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi with Bluetooth assistance; no hub is required. The limits are clear: there is no 5 GHz support, and its IP00 rating provides no stated ingress protection. Choose it for an indoor, ordinary-load appliance, not a damp location.

   Pros:

   • Single-plug format lets buyers start with one appliance.
   • Reports real-time power draw and daily or monthly usage.
   • Matter works with major platforms without a hub.
   • Schedules and several timer modes support flexible automation.

   Cons:

   • Only supports 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi.
   • IP00 rating provides no stated ingress protection.
   • One plug is less suited to multi-room coverage than the SIXWGH four-pack.

   Best for: A Matter newcomer who wants to monitor one indoor appliance and check whether the energy data and automations suit their routine.

   Not ideal for: Buyers monitoring several appliances, using 5 GHz-only Wi-Fi, or needing a plug with stated ingress protection.

   • Number of items:1
   • Connectivity:Matter, 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, Bluetooth-assisted setup
   • Compatible ecosystems:Alexa, Apple Home, Google Home, SmartThings, Siri
   • Maximum wattage:1800W
   • Operating voltage:125V
   • Energy monitoring:Real-time power draw and daily/monthly usage
   • Dimensions:2 x 2 x 2 inches
   • Ingress protection:IP00
   Our verdict

   “Choose this single SIXWGH plug to start tracking one indoor appliance; buy the four-pack if you already know you need broader coverage.”

   → See it on Amazon →

6. Tapo P210M Matter-Certified Smart In-Wall Outlet

   

   Best In-Wall Pick

   View Latest Price

   The Tapo P210M suits buyers who want energy monitoring built into a permanent outlet rather than another plug protruding from the wall. Its two receptacles can be controlled independently or together, which gives it more flexibility for paired devices than a typical single smart plug such as the Kasa KP125MP4. Matter support spans major platforms, and local network control can keep commands working if the internet drops. The tradeoff is installation: this is not a quick plug-in upgrade, and setup requires neutral wiring plus 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi. It is also limited to indoor, dry locations. I’d choose it for a fixed outlet with two devices to manage, but a four-pack of surface plugs is easier to relocate and spread around a room.

   Pros:

   • Controls two receptacles independently or together
   • Matter support works with major smart home platforms
   • Energy monitoring, schedules, and away mode are included
   • Local network control can work when the internet is unavailable

   Cons:

   • Requires neutral wiring and 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi for setup
   • In-wall installation is less flexible than a plug-in model
   • Rated only for indoor, dry-location use

   Best for: Homeowners replacing a standard indoor outlet who want separate control and energy monitoring for two connected devices.

   Not ideal for: Renters or anyone without neutral wiring, since installation requires in-wall wiring and the outlet is not portable.

   • Model:P210M
   • Outlet control:Two devices, independently or together
   • Connectivity:Wi-Fi; Bluetooth for setup
   • Wi-Fi band:2.4 GHz
   • Smart home compatibility:Matter, Apple Home, Amazon Alexa, Google Home, Samsung SmartThings
   • Neutral wiring:Required
   • Maximum total load:15 A, up to 1875 W
   • Use:Indoor, dry locations
   Our verdict

   “Choose the P210M if you want a permanent, dual-device Matter outlet and can handle the wiring requirements.”

   → See it on Amazon →

7. Tapo P110M Matter Smart Plugs with Energy Monitoring, 4-Pack, 15A

   

   Best Value for Multi-Room Monitoring

   View Latest Price

   For buyers outfitting several rooms, the Tapo P110M four-pack puts Matter energy monitoring and control in one compact set. Its usage statistics and bill estimates make consumption easier to follow than with the ONVIS Matter over Thread four-pack, which does not list energy monitoring. Compact bodies also help preserve access to neighboring outlets. The compromise is connectivity: these plugs use 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, not Thread, so they are a better fit for homes with dependable Wi-Fi coverage than for shoppers prioritizing a Thread-based network. They support app, voice, and scheduled control across major platforms, but the supplied specifications do not describe offline local control. I’d pick this set for straightforward, multi-room tracking; buyers who specifically want Thread should compare it with Eve Energy or ONVIS instead.

   Pros:

   • Four plugs provide energy monitoring across multiple devices
   • Usage statistics and bill estimates help make consumption easier to track
   • Matter support spans major smart home platforms
   • Compact design leaves neighboring outlets accessible

   Cons:

   • Wi-Fi connectivity is limited to 2.4 GHz
   • No Thread connectivity is listed
   • Offline local control is not specified in the product data

   Best for: Households that want to monitor and schedule several everyday appliances across multiple rooms using a 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi network.

   Not ideal for: Buyers building a Thread-first setup or anyone whose home network lacks reliable 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi.

   • Model:P110M
   • Pack size:4
   • Maximum wattage:1800 W
   • Connectivity:Matter, Wi-Fi
   • Wi-Fi band:2.4 GHz
   • Control methods:App, voice, scheduling
   • Compatible platforms:Alexa, Apple HomeKit, Google Home, Samsung SmartThings
   • Certification:UL certified
   Our verdict

   “Choose this four-pack for compact, Wi-Fi-based Matter energy tracking across several rooms.”

   → See it on Amazon →

8. Eve Energy Matter Smart Plug with App and Voice Control

   

   Best for Privacy-Minded Thread Users

   View Latest Price

   The Eve Energy is the standout here for buyers who value local control and a Thread-based setup more than built-in energy tracking. Matter over Thread lets it communicate locally, and Eve says it works without an Eve cloud, registration, or tracking. That makes it a different proposition from the energy-monitoring Tapo P110M: the Eve listing does not specify energy monitoring, so I would not choose it when measuring appliance consumption is the main goal. It supports app, voice, remote, and presence-based control, but a compatible hub is required for the chosen platform. Its single-plug format also costs more effort to deploy across a home than the Tapo or Kasa four-packs. I’d place it on the list for privacy-conscious Thread households, not as the strongest energy-measurement pick.

   Pros:

   • Matter over Thread supports local communication
   • No Eve cloud, registration, or tracking is required
   • Works with Apple Home, Alexa, Google Home, and SmartThings through a compatible hub
   • UL certified with a two-year warranty

   Cons:

   • A compatible hub is required for the chosen smart home platform
   • Energy monitoring is not specified in the product data
   • Requires iOS/iPadOS 16.4 or later or Android 8.1 or later

   Best for: Privacy-conscious smart home owners with a compatible Thread hub who want local Matter control for a light or appliance.

   Not ideal for: Shoppers whose main requirement is energy monitoring, since the supplied product details do not specify that feature.

   • Model:20EBU4101
   • Connectivity:Matter over Thread
   • Voltage:120 V AC
   • Amperage:15 A
   • Dimensions:2.36 × 2.76 × 1.52 in
   • Compatible platforms:Apple Home, Amazon Alexa, Google Home, SmartThings
   • Certification:UL
   • Warranty:2 years
   Our verdict

   “Pick Eve Energy for privacy-oriented Thread control, but choose an explicitly energy-monitoring model if consumption data is essential.”

   → See it on Amazon →

9. Kasa Matter Smart Plug with Energy Monitoring, 15A/1800W, 4-Pack

   

   Best for Offline Wi-Fi Control

   View Latest Price

   The Kasa KP125MP4 earns its place for buyers who want a four-plug energy-monitoring setup with local control when internet is offline. That distinction matters if you still want to operate connected devices during a broadband outage; the Tapo P110M also offers energy monitoring, but its supplied details do not specify offline control. Kasa’s plugs work with Matter across Apple Home, Alexa, Google Home, and SmartThings, and their compact shape is designed to avoid blocking adjacent outlets. The main limits are familiar Wi-Fi requirements: setup relies on 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, and the maximum load is 15 A/1800 W. Compared with the Thread-based ONVIS four-pack, Kasa is the clearer fit for explicit energy monitoring, while ONVIS is the alternative for shoppers prioritizing Thread and local control.

   Pros:

   • Four Matter-compatible plugs include energy monitoring
   • Local network control can continue when internet access is offline
   • Works with Apple Home, Amazon Alexa, Google Home, and Samsung SmartThings
   • Compact, UL-certified flame-retardant design

   Cons:

   • Requires a 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi network
   • Maximum load is limited to 15 A and 1800 W
   • Uses Wi-Fi rather than Thread

   Best for: Wi-Fi smart home users who want energy monitoring on four devices and want local control to continue during internet outages.

   Not ideal for: Buyers who need Thread connectivity, support for loads above 15 A or 1800 W, or a network without 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi.

   • Model:KP125MP4
   • Pack size:4
   • Maximum wattage:1800 W
   • Operating voltage:120 V
   • Connectivity:Matter, Wi-Fi
   • Wi-Fi band:2.4 GHz
   • Compatible platforms:Apple Home, Amazon Alexa, Google Home, Samsung SmartThings
   • Warranty:2-year limited warranty
   Our verdict

   “Choose the Kasa four-pack if offline local operation and energy monitoring matter more than Thread connectivity.”

   → See it on Amazon →

10. ONVIS Matter over Thread Smart Plug, 4-Pack

    

    Best Compact Thread Four-Pack

    View Latest Price

    The ONVIS four-pack is the compact Thread choice for buyers who want to control several devices without sacrificing access to neighboring outlets. It supports Matter, schedules, timers, grouping, and voice control, while local control without internet or cloud dependency suits homes that want responsive operation on the local network. Compared with the Kasa KP125MP4, though, ONVIS has a major gap for this roundup: energy monitoring is not mentioned, so it cannot be the pick for buyers who want consumption data. Remote control also has a specific hardware requirement—a HomePod mini or Apple TV—so check your setup before buying. Its 15 A/1800 W limit is shared by many plug-in options here. I’d choose ONVIS for compact Thread-based control, but pick Kasa or Tapo when measuring energy use is the priority.

    Pros:

    • Matter over Thread supports local control without internet or cloud dependency
    • Four compact plugs are designed to leave adjacent outlets accessible
    • Supports schedules, timers, grouping, and voice control
    • Compatible with Apple Home, Alexa, Google Home, and Samsung SmartThings

    Cons:

    • Energy monitoring is not mentioned in the product details
    • Remote control requires a HomePod mini or Apple TV
    • Maximum power is limited to 1800 W

    Best for: Thread-equipped households that need four compact Matter plugs for schedules, grouping, and local control of ordinary devices.

    Not ideal for: Energy-monitoring shoppers, or buyers who need remote control but do not own a HomePod mini or Apple TV.

    • Part number:S4-US
    • Pack size:4
    • Connectivity:Matter, Thread
    • Compatible platforms:Apple Home, Amazon Alexa, Google Home, Samsung SmartThings
    • Voltage:110 V
    • Amperage:15 A
    • Maximum power:1800 W
    • Remote control requirement:HomePod mini or Apple TV
    Our verdict

    “Choose ONVIS for a compact four-plug Thread setup, but skip it if energy readings are a must-have.”

    → See it on Amazon →

11. Eve Energy Matter Smart Plug and Power Meter, 2-Pack

    

    Best for Privacy-Focused Thread Homes

    View Latest Price

    The Eve Energy 2-pack suits buyers who want Matter-based energy monitoring without tying everyday operation to a manufacturer cloud account. Its Thread connectivity can also contribute to a stronger Thread network, while app, voice, remote, and automated control let you fit monitoring into an existing smart-home routine. Compared with the four-plug Meross MSS315, Eve offers Thread rather than Wi-Fi connectivity and puts more emphasis on cloud-free local operation; Meross is the more practical choice when you want to outfit more outlets at once. Eve’s main tradeoff is the required compatible hub, alongside supported mobile-device requirements. This two-pack makes the most sense for privacy-minded households already using a compatible Matter and Thread setup, but it is less compelling for buyers who need broad coverage on a single purchase.

    Pros:

    • Matter support works with major smart-home platforms
    • Thread connectivity can help extend a Thread network
    • Local operation does not require an Eve cloud account, registration, or tracking
    • Supports app, voice, remote, and automated control

    Cons:

    • A compatible platform hub is required
    • Requires a supported iOS, iPadOS, or Android device
    • Two plugs offer less outlet coverage than Meross’s four-pack

    Best for: Privacy-conscious Apple, Alexa, Google, SmartThings, or Home Assistant households with a compatible hub and an established or planned Thread network.

    Not ideal for: Shoppers without a compatible hub, or anyone seeking a larger multi-outlet pack or Wi-Fi-based plug that avoids Thread requirements.

    • Pack size:2 plugs
    • Connectivity:Matter and Thread
    • Voltage:120 V AC
    • Compatible platforms:Apple, Amazon Alexa, Google, SmartThings, Home Assistant
    • Hub:Compatible platform hub required
    • Plug type:Type A and B
    • Dimensions:1.5 × 2.8 × 2.4 in
    • Certifications:UL, cULus
    • Warranty:2 years
    Our verdict

    “Choose Eve for cloud-free Matter energy monitoring and Thread support if you already have a compatible hub; choose Meross if covering more outlets matters more.”

    → See it on Amazon →

12. Meross Matter Smart Plug with Energy Monitoring, 4-Pack

    

    Best for Multi-Room Coverage

    View Latest Price

    For buyers who want energy monitoring in several rooms, the Meross MSS315’s four-plug pack is its clearest advantage. It reports real-time and historical energy data and adds schedules, voice control, and local LAN control, so routine operation need not depend on remote cloud access. Compared with the two-plug Eve Energy pack, Meross covers more outlets in one purchase and uses 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi rather than Thread. That makes it a fit for Wi-Fi-centered homes, but a drawback for anyone building a Thread network: Thread is not supported. Setup also depends on a Matter-compatible hub, 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, and IPv6, so it is not a hub-free shortcut. I’d pick Meross for broad household coverage and accessible energy history, but choose Eve if cloud-free operation and Thread matter more than plug count.

    Pros:

    • Four plugs provide coverage for multiple appliances and rooms
    • Energy monitoring includes real-time and historical data
    • Supports local LAN control, schedules, and voice commands
    • Compact polycarbonate design uses fire-retardant material

    Cons:

    • Requires a Matter-compatible hub, 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, and IPv6
    • Does not support Thread
    • Mobile-device requirements include iOS 16.1 or later or Android 8.1 or later

    Best for: Households with a compatible Matter hub that want to monitor several appliances across multiple rooms over 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi.

    Not ideal for: Thread-network builders, homes without a compatible hub or IPv6, and buyers who want energy-monitoring plugs that connect without Wi-Fi.

    • Model:MSS315
    • Quantity:4 plugs
    • Connectivity:2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Matter
    • Operating voltage:120 V
    • Maximum wattage:1800 W
    • Compatible platforms:Apple Home, Alexa, Google Home, SmartThings, Meross app
    • Network requirements:2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and IPv6
    • Hub:Matter-compatible hub required
    • Certifications:ETL, FCC
    Our verdict

    “Choose Meross when you want energy data across several outlets on a Wi-Fi-based Matter setup; choose Eve if Thread and cloud-free operation take priority.”

    → See it on Amazon →

How We Picked

I ranked these products around the needs implied by this roundup: Matter compatibility and usable energy monitoring. I also weighed connection type, outlet format, rated capacity where specified, pack size, and how easily a product could fit common room-by-room setups. A power strip can be more useful at a desk or media center, while a compact plug pack may work better for spreading control across several rooms. Thread options earned a distinct place for households already equipped for Thread, while Wi-Fi models remain the simpler comparison for many existing networks.

The order favors products that combine monitoring, Matter support, and practical versatility without requiring a specialized installation. Models with different strengths are kept in the lineup rather than treated as interchangeable: the P316M is judged as a strip, the P210M as an in-wall outlet, and the Eve and Onvis Thread products as network-specific alternatives. I do not assume that every Matter device exposes identical energy data in every platform; app support and feature presentation can vary. Before buying, check current product documentation for the exact monitoring functions, hub or border-router requirements, and regional electrical specifications.

Factors to Consider When Choosing Best Matter Energy Monitoring Smart Plugs

Choosing among Matter plugs is less about finding one universal winner and more about matching the hardware and network to your home. These broader checks can help prevent a common mismatch: buying a plug that supports Matter but does not deliver the monitoring, connection, or physical layout you expected.

Decide What You Need Energy Data To Tell You

Energy monitoring is useful when you have a question the data can answer, such as whether a device draws power while idle or how its use changes over time. Before choosing a plug, check whether its app or preferred smart-home platform shows the measurements and history you care about. Matter support does not guarantee identical energy dashboards across Apple Home, Google Home, Alexa, and the manufacturer’s app. A plug may still switch a device reliably while presenting limited consumption detail in a particular platform. Avoid paying for monitoring solely because it appears on the feature list if you will never review the readings. If measurement is the priority, confirm the exact functions in current documentation for your region and software version.

Choose Wi-Fi or Thread Around Your Existing Setup

Wi-Fi plugs connect through a compatible wireless network, while Thread models need a Thread border router to join a Thread network. That makes the network you already own a practical starting point, rather than treating either protocol as automatically better. Thread can be a good fit for a prepared smart home, but buying a Thread plug before checking for a compatible border router can add extra setup work. Wi-Fi may be more straightforward, though many connected devices can add pressure to a crowded network. Check whether your router supports the required bands and whether the product’s setup instructions match your home. Also confirm that the smart-home controller you use can add Matter devices over the selected transport.

Match the Outlet Format to the Room

A standard plug, a power strip, and an in-wall outlet solve different layout problems. A plug pack is easier to distribute between rooms, while a strip can bring several devices together at a desk or entertainment area. Physical fit matters as much as app compatibility: a bulky adapter may cover a neighboring outlet, and a strip’s cord and footprint may not suit every location. An in-wall model can create a more permanent setup, but it is not a portable substitute and may call for installation work. Measure tight spaces and check outlet orientation before ordering. For appliances with unusual plugs or larger power supplies, verify spacing and ratings rather than assuming every smart outlet will fit.

Check Electrical Ratings Against the Actual Load

Use the plug’s listed voltage, current, and wattage limits as a boundary, not as a target. Compare those specifications with the appliance label and follow the manufacturer’s instructions for the product and intended load. A 15A or 1800W rating does not make every appliance suitable; motors, heaters, and other high-draw devices may have requirements that call for extra care. Do not chain smart plugs, power strips, or extension cords unless the product instructions explicitly allow that arrangement. For a power strip, check whether the rating applies to the whole strip rather than each outlet independently. When the load is uncertain, choose a different control method or consult a qualified electrician.

Treat Matter as Compatibility, Not a Promise of Identical Features

Matter is designed to help devices work across supported smart-home platforms, but it does not make every manufacturer feature appear everywhere. Basic on-and-off control may be more consistent than energy history or advanced settings, which can depend on the plug’s app and platform support. Check the product’s current compatibility notes for your preferred controller before buying, especially if energy readings are the main reason for the purchase. Multi-admin setup can let a device join more than one Matter ecosystem, but setup steps and feature access can still differ. Keep the manufacturer app available if it is needed for firmware updates or device-specific monitoring. This avoids assuming that one platform will expose every capability shown in the product listing.

Buy the Right Pack Size and Leave Room to Expand

Pack size can make it tempting to buy more plugs than your home currently needs. Start by listing the devices and rooms where switching or monitoring would change a decision; a plug used for a device with little measurable standby draw may add clutter without much insight. Choose a multi-pack when you have several clear use cases, not simply because the package contains more units. Also think ahead about the number of Wi-Fi devices your router can comfortably support or the Thread coverage and border-router placement in your home. Standardize on a connection type where practical, but do not force a match if one room has different requirements. A smaller initial setup can reveal whether the monitoring and app experience suit you before you outfit the whole home.

Frequently Asked Questions

Will every Matter energy-monitoring plug show power data in Apple Home, Google Home, or Alexa?

No. Matter compatibility helps supported devices connect across smart-home ecosystems, but it does not promise that every platform will show the same energy measurements, graphs, or history. Some functions may be available only in the manufacturer’s app or may depend on software updates. Before choosing a plug, check the maker’s current compatibility notes for both Matter and energy monitoring. If you mainly want consumption data, verify the exact readings in the platform you plan to use rather than relying on a general Matter label.

Do I need a Thread border router for the Onvis or Eve Thread options?

Thread-based devices need a compatible Thread network, commonly provided by a smart-home hub or another supported border router. A Matter controller and a Thread border router are related roles, but not every Matter controller provides Thread connectivity. Check the specifications of your existing hub and the plug before purchasing. If your home has no compatible Thread border router, a Wi-Fi Matter plug may be the simpler choice unless you plan to add Thread infrastructure.

Can I use a smart plug with a heater, refrigerator, or other high-draw appliance?

Do not assume that a smart plug is appropriate for a high-draw appliance just because its rating lists 15A or 1800W. Compare the appliance’s electrical requirements with the plug’s full specifications and follow both manufacturers’ instructions, including any cautions for motors or heating loads. A power strip’s capacity may apply to the combined load, not each outlet separately. If the appliance manual prohibits use with an external switch or the ratings are unclear, do not connect it through the plug. Ask a qualified electrician when you cannot confirm that the pairing is safe.

Is a four-pack a better choice than buying one smart plug at a time?

A four-pack makes sense when you already have several suitable devices or want to outfit multiple rooms with the same setup. It can be a poor fit if you are still learning whether your platform exposes the energy data you want or whether the plugs fit your outlets. Check the pack’s connection type and monitoring features carefully; the number of plugs alone does not tell you what each unit can do. Starting with one unit can help confirm compatibility and app behavior before you commit to a larger group. If you already have clear use cases, a multi-pack may reduce setup repetition.

Should I choose a power strip or an in-wall outlet instead of standard smart plugs?

Choose by installation and placement, not just by the number of devices you want to control. The Tapo P316M power strip is suited to a shared location where several devices need outlets in one place, while the Tapo P210M is a permanent in-wall format rather than a plug you can move between rooms. Standard smart plugs are more flexible for spreading control around the home, though they may occupy space beside neighboring sockets. Check physical clearance, installation requirements, and the product’s supported monitoring features before deciding. If portability matters, an in-wall outlet is unlikely to be the right substitute.

Conclusion

For most buyers seeking a balance of Matter compatibility, energy monitoring, and multi-room usefulness, I recommend the Tapo P110M as the best overall choice in this lineup. The best value direction is a monitoring-enabled multi-pack such as the SIXWGH or Meross options, provided their current specifications and platform support match your needs. For a more premium, Thread-oriented setup, consider Eve Energy, while buyers new to Matter may prefer a Wi-Fi model whose setup matches their existing network and controller. Choose the Tapo P316M for a shared desk or media area, and the P210M when a permanent in-wall outlet is the goal. If Thread coverage, energy-data presentation, or outlet fit remains uncertain, verify those details before selecting a pack size.